Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Santhanakrishnan's avatar

SNAP is a non starter for me because Class A public shares are practically non voting, and founders control 99% of votes through Class C shares. This means the board has no teeth, and founders face no real pressure from the board or shareholders, except through stock price.

Founder authoritarianism works well only if they stay sane and focused, but that’s a structural flaw. It’s a public company in name only, acting like a private one.

This fails the smell test and it is a red flag in governance. It might work out if founders execute perfectly, but it defies sound investment principles and risk management. Sure, founders can ignore short term noise for long term focus, but with zero shareholder accountability?.

Even the goats Zuckerberg, Bezos, Sergy brin, Larry Page, Larry ellison, Elon Musk have far more accountability to their sharebolders.

No posts

Ready for more?